Important Social/Civil Rights Issues!

[elf]

Passionate but off-kilter rant about social & civil rights issues. Conflation of race, gender, class and disability issues. Proclamations of evils, with extensive collection of links, mostly to blogs of friends or former friends. Accusations of flaunting of privilege leveraged at (1) poster's ex-romantic-partner, (2) poster's ex-employer, (3) poster's current roommates.

Pre-emptive denial of privilege in self, on the grounds of enlightenment, liberal political bias, and donations of money to homeless shelters within the last month.

Admission of discomfort in the presence of one category of underprivileged persons, followed by incoherent story of childhood event which supposedly justifies aforementioned discomfort.

Comments

[jmtorres]

Poorly-spelled irrelevant sidebar on the intersection of BDSM and feminism, wrt OP and OP's ex-partner.

[elf]

Immediate abandonment of original topic. Long, tangential ramble about BDSM community drama of specific interest to OP and OP's partner(s).

[pauamma]

Poorly spelled demand for PC to instantly accept commenter's superiority and become plaything.

[pauamma]

Long list of links relevant to the subject, using images for link anchors. Most images are uncaptioned. The ones that are are NWS, and the alt text uses very crude language.

[pauamma]

Mention of misreading of #2 in list. Said misreading appears to aim for "artfully contrived", but fails miserably.

[jmtorres]

Demand for spankings, stating that poster has behaved inappropriately.

[elf]

Confusion. Expressions of uncertainty of comment's purpose.

Vehement reiteration of original claims.

[elf]

Insistence that only OP can declare inappropriate behavior. Demand for moderator confirmation of comm rules. Poorly disguised attempt to claim anger over nonexistent rules violations rather than offers of spanks to other people.

[pauamma]

Request that PC dress appropriately before being administered same.

[pauamma]

Statement of insanely complex, capricious rules, contradicting rules stated in community profile. No explanation of relevance to PC's question.

[pauamma]

More contrived, weak puns.